222 vs Amata

Pricing

222 is priced at $$ (Free app; events typically $30–$60 per experience), while Amata comes in at Free (Free to download, premium plans likely available).

Format & matching

222 uses groups of Small groups, compared to Amata’s 1:1, and both use algorithm-based matching.

How they work

222: Download the app and complete a detailed personality quiz — it covers your interests, values, social style, and what kind of experiences you're into. 222 uses this to build a 'curation profile' that determines which events you get invited to and who you'll be grouped with. When an experience is available in your city, you'll get an invite — say yes, and you're in. On the night of, you show up to the venue and meet your group. The evening is planned for you: dinner, drinks, a venue, maybe a second stop. All you have to do is show up and be yourself.

Amata: Download the app and start a conversation with your AI matchmaker. It asks about your lifestyle, values, what you're looking for, and what you're not — building a real picture of who you are beyond a photo grid. When the AI finds someone it thinks is a strong fit, it introduces you both. If you're both interested, Amata handles the logistics: it checks your availability and books a table at a curated restaurant. You show up, have the date, and then debrief with your AI afterward. Every piece of feedback sharpens future matches.

What to love

222: No profiles, no DMs, no swiping — removes all the friction and awkwardness of typical social apps. Personality-based matching means you're not just thrown in with random strangers. Full evening experiences (dinner + activity) feel like a real night out, not a forced meetup. All members are vetted before being selected for events. Strong TikTok community and word-of-mouth reputation in major cities.

Amata: The AI matchmaker learns from every conversation and date, getting smarter over time. Eliminates the worst parts of dating apps: swiping, small talk, and ghosting. Handles all the logistics — availability, restaurant booking, everything. Feels more like being set up by a friend than using an app. Focus on intentional dating filters out people who aren't serious.

Reality check

222: iOS only — no Android app available. Limited to a handful of US cities plus Toronto. Event costs add up on top of the free app. You can't choose who you go with — the algorithm decides.

Amata: iOS only — no Android or web app yet. Limited to NYC, Sydney, and Melbourne for now. Relies heavily on AI judgment, which won't always get it right. Small user base compared to mainstream dating apps means fewer potential matches.

Søren's take

On 222: 222 is one of the more interesting approaches to IRL social I've seen. By removing profiles and messaging entirely, they've eliminated the part of friendship apps that feels most like work. The personality matching and curated evenings mean you show up, meet cool people, and go somewhere fun — all without planning anything. The catch is availability: it's iOS-only and in just a few cities, so if you're not in NYC, LA, SF, or Chicago, you're out of luck for now. If you are, though, it's worth trying at least once.

On Amata: Amata is doing something genuinely different in a space that badly needs it. Instead of handing you a deck of profiles to swipe through, it acts like a matchmaker who actually listens. The AI conversation approach is smarter than a personality quiz — it picks up on nuance. The fact that it books the date for you removes so much friction. The catch is availability: with only three cities and an iOS-only app, your dating pool is limited. But if you're in one of those cities and you're done with swipe culture, Amata is worth trying.