Timeleft vs WasMeant
Timeleft and WasMeant are both friendship apps that help you meet people in real life, but they take different approaches. Here’s how they stack up across pricing, format, cities, and more.
Side-by-side comparison · Updated 2026
At a glance
Pricing
Both Timeleft and WasMeant fall in the $$ price range. Timeleft: ~$13/month + cost of your meal. WasMeant: ~$19 per dinner ticket + cost of your meal.
Format & matching
Timeleft uses groups of 6 per table, compared to WasMeant’s 4 per table, and both use algorithm-based matching.
How they work
Timeleft: Download the app and take a short personality test covering your interests, conversation style, and what you're looking for. Pick your city and a Wednesday that works. Timeleft's algorithm assembles a table of six people who have something in common — you won't know who until you arrive. On Wednesday evening, you'll get the restaurant name and a table number. Show up, sit down, and spend the evening with five strangers. No icebreakers, no name tags — just dinner.
WasMeant: Head to wasmeant.com and create an account. You'll fill out a personality questionnaire covering your interests, values, and social energy — takes about 10 minutes. Once your profile is complete, purchase a one-time dinner ticket ($18.99). Then pick which Friday dates work for you and start the group search. WasMeant's algorithm builds a balanced group of four people with compatible personalities. You'll get the restaurant name and details by email once your group is confirmed — usually 24 hours before. Show up Friday at 7 PM, sit down, and spend the evening with three strangers at a curated spot in Manhattan, Brooklyn, or Williamsburg.
What to love
Timeleft: Genuinely algorithmic matching creates surprisingly good conversation. Available in 300+ cities across 60 countries. Low-commitment weekly format makes it easy to try. The Wednesday ritual becomes a habit that compounds. No awkward planning — just show up.
WasMeant: Algorithmic matching based on a real personality questionnaire — not random groupings. Small groups of four keep conversations intimate and comfortable. No app download required — sign up and manage everything on the website. Pay-per-dinner model with no subscription or auto-renewal. Restaurant selection is curated for atmosphere, not hype.
Reality check
Timeleft: Restaurant food cost is separate and can add up. Wednesday-only schedule is rigid. Quality of matches can vary by city size. Some cities have limited restaurant variety.
WasMeant: NYC only — if you're not in New York, you're out of luck. Friday-only schedule at 7 PM is rigid if your weekends are unpredictable. Ticket price covers coordination only — you still pay for your own meal and drinks. Relatively new platform, so the matching pool may be smaller than established competitors.
Søren's take
On Timeleft: I think Timeleft is the gold standard for IRL social platforms right now. The personality-matching algorithm actually works — I've had tables where every single person clicked. The Wednesday-only format sounds limiting, but it's actually genius: it creates a ritual. My one gripe is that you're paying the subscription AND buying dinner, so a night out can run $50-80 total. Worth it if you're new to a city or just want to break out of your social bubble.
On WasMeant: WasMeant feels like the scrappy, NYC-native answer to Timeleft. The premise is nearly identical — personality-matched dinners with strangers — but the execution is more intimate: groups of four instead of six, and a deliberate focus on one city done well rather than scaling everywhere at once. The Friday-at-7-PM ritual is a nice counterpoint to Timeleft's Wednesday format. The biggest limitation is obvious: it's NYC only. But if you live in New York and want a low-pressure way to meet genuinely interesting people over dinner, this is worth a ticket.
